I just came across this article on ZDnet from Richard Stiennon and felt I had to say something about it as it’s the most rubbish I have read in a long time and displays a complete misunderstanding of the issues at hand from a so called “industry consultant”.
“Evidently the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties Committee is discussing classifying IP addresses as personally identifiable information. That is crazy talk of the third degree. They think of IP addresses as physical addresses when they should think of them as freeway exits. I, for instance, live nearest to exit 69 , Big Beaver Road, off of I-75. (yeah, yeah, its a big joke around here). And, of course, that exit number can change at anytime, arbitrarily. I can see how the clueless can be confused by IP addresses.”
Not everyone has a dynamic address you know, and a static address is personally identifiable information and should be protected as such. You can often resolve an IP to a physical address using an ARIN or RIPE search. Even with DHCP, some cable/DSL providers assign the same MAC address with the same IP everytime, which in essence becomes “your” IP until you replace your modem.
A google search for my own IP throws up results for server logs of many sites I have visited in the past. While the Commission have come up with some crazy rules, this is one of the better ones. Crazy talk? I don’t think so, not if you value your privacy.














